UFSC study shows prolonged tenure leads managers to favour conservative actions.
Reporter's Day: critical reflection warns of language impoverishment and profession's future challenges.
Journalist Fernando Rodrigues's post is a beautiful reflux on Reporter's Day. From now on, it integrates my sacred canon of the profession, like a Pauline letter with its dissonances.
Journalism, even if it doesn't utilize Critical Theory, from which one can name countless phenomena and behaviors, or any other theory, has within it a perspective on the world that asks objective questions, among which "why do we exist?".
The reporter of the future, unlike the pornographic (HAN, 2017), will have to, before very elaborate discussions, turn to vocabulary. It's as if the iconic vices of "summer vacationers" or "revelers" have gotten out of control.
Access to modest cultural products, like those offered by digital influencers, or even well-produced television programs with hyperboles that never end, or the impoverished rhymes of sertanejo music about an obsessive, if not violent, love, should be part of the repertoire. But, when these elements are the only lenses through which to see the world, there is no good communication, let alone journalism.
When U2 released the album "No Line On The Horizon", I commented to a songwriter friend that I had considered it sad, sadder than the previous one, back in 2008. Her answer struck me: "we are not getting better". "The Day of Creation", by Vinicius de Moraes:
On the contrary, we need to be logical, frequently dogmatic
We need to face the problem of moral and aesthetic positions
Be social, cultivate habits, laugh without wanting to and even make love without wanting to
Our profession requires more depth from us, not less. It requires more genuine empathy, not superficial talk about a subject that I don't even agree with that much, but I understand you (in reality, understanding nothing).
Suicide of the elderly, overcoming grief, childhood depression, pornography as a disease, bank violence are some of the topics that will be on the agenda-setting tomorrow. And they should not be treated with silly puns.
More like this: "Now that I am a complete man, I am full of emptiness".
Strength, reporters. Here, it continues like the Wild West
Leia insights sobre a interação de humanos com modelos de linguagem de IA, e sobre os ODS no Brasil. Lab Educação 2050 Ltda, que mantém este site, é signatária do Pacto Global das Nações Unidas.
Empathetic, logical inquiry needs rigor; avoid shallow coverage.
Addressing taboos & vulnerabilities bolsters societal justice & openness.
UFSC study shows prolonged tenure leads managers to favour conservative actions.
A recent study published in the *Revista Turismo, Visão e Ação* (RTVA) reveals that older managers with longer tenures in restaurants tend to be more risk-averse in their corporate decisions. The research, conducted by researchers at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), analyzed data from over 2,000 restaurants in Europe between 2014 and 2016.
The study, titled "Influence of Management Team Characteristics on Risk Decision-Making: Evidence from the Restaurant Sector," utilized the Amadeus database and employed the least squares method to analyze the relationship between manager characteristics – age, tenure, gender, and team size – and the companies' level of financial leverage, used as a risk-taking indicator.
The results showed a significant negative correlation between the age and tenure of managers and their propensity for risk. Older managers and those who had held the same position for a longer period demonstrated a preference for more conservative decisions, opting to maintain the status quo rather than adopting innovative or risky strategies.
Contrary to some expectations, the study found no significant relationship between the size of the management team or female participation and risk-taking. Although previous research has suggested a possible influence of these factors, the data analyzed did not confirm this hypothesis in the specific context of the restaurant industry.
The authors suggest that the risk aversion demonstrated by more experienced managers may be related to the prioritization of stability and the reputation built throughout their careers. Familiarity with the sector and a concern to preserve accumulated gains may lead them to avoid decisions that represent potential threats to the business.
The study's findings have significant implications for restaurant management. The research suggests that the composition of the management team can directly influence the strategy and performance of companies. Restaurants with younger managers may be more willing to innovate and take risks, while those led by more experienced managers may prioritize stability and financial security.
The researchers highlight the need for further studies to deepen the understanding of the relationship between manager characteristics and decision-making in restaurants. Investigating psychological factors, such as individual risk tolerance, and analyzing data from a longer period could enrich the discussion and provide more precise insights for the sector.
Lack of updates and context erodes reader trust.
A journalistic suite is the continuation of a news story in new articles that update previous ones. Something like: "Two people were injured in an accident"; then, "Men injured in accident undergo surgery"; further, "Men injured in accident discharged from hospital"; and finally, "Company responsible for accident involving injuries fined." All these sensational headlines relate to the same original event.
Not every type of news warrants a continuation. Some events and accomplishments have the momentum for a single appearance. However, to appear once or several times in the newspaper, the "thing" must truly be news, which basically means it's not advertising or propaganda – but that's a topic for another time.
In terms of format, a suite is no different from a new news story. After all, a continuation only exists when a new fact is revealed. But it's in style, from what I've observed, that the "marmita das suítes azedou" – meaning why they've lost momentum in recent years. ("Marmita das suítes azedou" is an idiom meaning roughly that the suites have gone stale or lost their appeal).
Let's take a police investigation as an example. Journalism of both good and poor quality is interested in criminal stories. However, in both types of quality, a flavor of vice remains, perhaps originating from the pleasure of "scooping" (when a journalist is the first to report something). It's a haste that hinders more than it helps: not infrequently, versions are presented that collaborate with a story one wants to tell, which may have nothing to do with what actually happened.
In the case of Armed man threatens Black youth in São Paulo, and police officer refuses to act because she's 'off-duty'; watch video (sense-based translation), for example. This is a story that quickly captured the attention of journalists and the public because a video proves not only the omission of a police officer but also her aggression against a young man. Here, whether the police officer was right or wrong is not under discussion. At the same time, due to the lack of suites, the broader context of the three-minute video was missing.
A story told because of its intriguing nature can yield minutes of viewership and an increase in website visitors. However, without continuity, it's shooting oneself in the foot. In 2023, the Reuters Institute's Digital News Report identified that Brazilians' trust in journalism is 43%, a decrease of 19 percentage points since 2015. Statistically, the downward trend may reach 41% in 2024. In this scenario, all resources of intelligence and integrity are welcome to improve these numbers.
Suites are an opportunity to assure the public that editorial choices represent, even if against the majority view, the vehicle's commitment to a story told from beginning to end, with all its nuances. For this, the editorial line as a whole, and even more so the reporters and editors, must approach investigative activity with the detachment of recounting things as they are, and not as they should be.