Every drafts and review matters
Extract structured data from hundreds of documents at the same time.
5 min read
2 days ago
The contractual method in Transactional Analysis establishes, from the very beginning, the clarity of goals and responsibilities between the therapist, the client, or the participants in a training.
It gives everyone involved the opportunity to express expectations, define concrete objectives, and, most importantly, to understand how each person will contribute to the progress of the process.
This approach contrasts with therapeutic or educational models in which only the professional holds the reins at every stage, unilaterally deciding what will be addressed, for how long, and to what extent.
Eric Berne, the founder of Transactional Analysis, emphasized that genuine dialogue is fundamental for consistent results. For this reason, a well-structured contract serves as a guide, sustaining motivation and therapeutic direction, and keeping the process free from ambiguities that often generate disinterest or a sense of powerlessness.
Through this system of agreements, everyone assumes their share of responsibility, ensuring that no one sees the process as a mere imposition or, conversely, as something overly loose without defined objectives.
This way of organizing sessions or meetings increases awareness of signs of progress, specific difficulties, and possible moments for adaptation. If circumstances change, the contract can and should be revised, indicating the method's flexibility and its appreciation for personal development and the construction of new solutions.
In essence, the contract serves as a bridge between theory and practice. It translates the theoretical language of Transactional Analysis into achievable goals, making it possible for the client to clearly understand what underlies concepts such as Ego States or psychological games.
Practice becomes more effective because each stage has a pre-established purpose, and the client gains clarity about the reason behind each exercise or reflection promoted by the therapist or facilitator.
With this, there is likely to be greater motivation to move forward, since the individual concretely perceives that there is a path to be followed and that the results depend directly on their engagement.
This personal empowerment, a hallmark of Transactional Analysis, emerges vividly in the contractual relationship: the client ceases to be a mere receiver of recommendations and becomes the author of their own story, playing an active role in overcoming repetitive and dysfunctional patterns.
One of the strengths of this method is the encouragement of autonomy. Once established, the contract acts as a reference point for evaluating the progress of each goal.
If someone notices they are at a standstill, the agreement provides objective clues for identifying what is not working. For example, one can question whether the goal was realistic, if there was a communication breakdown, or if there is an unresolved emotional factor.
The contractual method also accommodates the dynamics of relationships within groups, in the case of workshops or trainings with multiple people, making it clear how each participant will contribute and what they can expect in return from collective interactions.
In organizations, this procedure increases individual commitment and reduces the room for misinterpretations, as each employee or team member knows their speaking space, responsibilities, and how the desired changes influence both the professional and personal environment.
Beyond the clinical and corporate fields, the clarity brought by the contractual method facilitates the integration of Transactional Analysis practices in educational and community spaces.
Young students or members of a social project can benefit from well-constructed agreements, learning about the importance of conscious pacts and habits of transparent communication.
Each person, by better understanding the functioning of the Parent, Adult, and Child Ego States, gains insight into how they are interacting with others, which fosters an environment more conducive to learning.
The motivational factor arises naturally when the reason for seeking change or improvement in relationships is known from the outset.
Similarly, the idea of contract in fraternities or social spaces stands as a tool that organizes and equalizes the group’s expectations, reducing conflicts derived from a lack of collective alignment.
This approach, at once planned and flexible, leads to better results because the contractual method makes intentions explicit and, above all, invites continual reflection.
Its purpose is not to make the process rigid, but to serve as a resource to be consulted if, at any point, participants feel confused or unmotivated.
When designing Transactional Analysis, Berne envisioned a therapeutic path in which hierarchy would be balanced by understanding and consent: the therapist proposes techniques, the client expresses their limitations and aspirations, and both jointly follow a process guided by shared goals.
If they need to redirect focus after a few sessions, this will happen naturally, as each change is both recorded and validated together.
Thus, it is not a mechanistic method, but a format of shared responsibility, reiterating fundamental principles such as the need for clear communication and the appreciation of both personal and collective autonomy.
