Every drafts and review matters
Extract structured data from hundreds of documents at the same time.
5 min read
2 days ago
In its broadest sense, a contract represents a formalized agreement between parties that defines obligations and rights, establishing goals, timeframes, and scopes for the achievement of a particular objective.
In contemporary society, contracts take various forms and apply in diverse contexts, adapting to the specifics of each relationship. Whether in the administrative sphere, the professional realm, or a more subjective context such as psychology, the concept of “contract” provides security that each party understands the value and responsibilities of their commitment.
Legal tradition defines the contract as a legal bond, subject to enforcement by regulatory actions if necessary. Transactional Analysis (TA), on the other hand, expands the idea beyond mere formality, understanding it as an agreement that promotes clarity and cohesion among parties, aiming for mutually beneficial outcomes.
Administrative contracts are among the most rigorously regulated in terms of legal requirements and transparency. Common in relations between public agencies and private companies, they are characterized by specific norms intended to ensure integrity and collective interest in the provision of services or the execution of public works.
Administrative contracts often establish strict penalties for non-compliance, given that public welfare is at stake. Aspects such as deadlines, technical specifications, budget limits, and performance guarantees are central.
From a transactional communication perspective, the State occupies the “supervisor” position—often described in TA as the Parent Ego State—ensuring the contractor's compliance. Meanwhile, the private company generally seeks to align its internal goals with the fulfillment of contract terms, using negotiation strategies typical of the Adult Ego State, balancing costs, deadlines, and project stakeholders.
The professional contract appears when individuals or organizations formalize direct service arrangements. Lawyers, consultants, independent professionals, and freelancers, for example, formalize contracts that define the scope of activities, expected outcomes, and compensation.
The importance of a professional contract lies not only in safeguarding agreed financial value but also in recording the extent of each party’s responsibilities. Transactional Analysis, which focuses on fostering healthy relationships, emphasizes that clear contract development promotes autonomy. Each party has the opportunity to express what they can offer and what they need in return, aligning expectations and preventing future conflicts.
In business partnerships, designers and consultants discuss tangible goals and deadlines: operating from the Adult Ego State, they evaluate concrete data; from the Parent State, stricter demands or guidance may arise; and from the Child State, creativity or occasional submission to hierarchical decisions may occur.
When referring to the psychological contract, formality gives way to subjectivity, emphasizing perceptions, expectations, and commitments that are not always documented but nonetheless exert a strong influence on relationships.
The term grew popular in the organizational field, describing what employees expect from their company and vice versa, even if such expectations are not present in formal employment contracts. Essentially, it encompasses the set of beliefs each person holds regarding how the other should behave in the relationship.
In psychotherapy, Transactional Analysis uses the psychological contract in a particular way, with therapist and client establishing clear objectives: investigating behavioral patterns, analyzing Ego States, and building more authentic communication. These agreements—even if not formalized by clauses—give the therapeutic process direction and firmness. They can also be revised as progress or goal changes occur, encouraging flexibility and a sense of shared responsibility.
Regardless of type—administrative, professional, or psychological—contracts present basic requirements for validity and effectiveness.
The first is mutual consent, meaning the genuine agreement of all parties, free of undue pressure or hidden information. In TA, this is linked to the concept of autonomy, as true consent occurs only when the choice is mature and conscious, with the Adult Ego State actively involved.
The next requirement is competence, relating to legal capacity and practical ability to fulfill the agreement. An organization, for example, must have appropriate resources to execute an administrative contract, just as a professional must have specific skills to perform their service.
In the psychological context, competence involves both the therapist’s preparation and the client’s informed consent about the process, ensuring both understand their roles and limitations.
Compensation refers to the idea that something of value will be exchanged. In a professional contract, it is monetary payment; in administrative ones, it can be institutional reciprocity.
Under Transactional Analysis, compensation extends beyond economics, encompassing reciprocal satisfaction and emotional gains, including recognition, motivation, and the establishment of positive bonds.
This exchange functions as a positive reinforcement in both the workplace and relational spheres. The goal is a process that upholds each party’s OK position, allowing the contract to be fulfilled consistently and harmoniously.
Finally, the legal object is the requirement that the contract have a purpose in conformity with law and ethical values. An administrative contract cannot violate public interest; a professional contract must not demand anything illegal; and a psychological contract must respect the ethical boundaries of therapeutic practice and the client’s rights.
When the object is clear, the parties know precisely what is expected and what must be delivered.
Transactional Analysis, in this sense, also highlights the importance of transparency and legitimacy, since concepts such as psychological games often emerge when a contract’s purpose is vague or distorted, leading to manipulation and misaligned expectations.
The more defined the scope, the lower the chances of exhausting surprises or irreconcilable conflicts.
